Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver
* Adeodato Simó <asp16@xxxxxxxxx> [2004-08-12 14:20 +0200]:
> * Nicolas Rachinsky [Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:52:35 +0200]:
>
> > > > My concern is, that mutt should only try to send the mail _after_ it's
> > > > sure it is stored in the fcc.
>
> > > > I would consider it a bug to send out a mail and not store it in the
> > > > fcc because, for example, the disk filling up in between.
>
> > > which (just if was not clear enough) could happen for every value of
> > > $fcc_anyway.
>
> > I'm not sure wether I understand you correctly. What does your 'which'
> > refer to?
>
> "to send out a mail and not store it in the fcc". that is, the problem
> you pointed out still exists with $fcc_anyway.
Ah, then I somehow missunderstood you. You are right.
> one could: write fcc, send message, if it fails, delete message from
> fcc, which sounds kind of insane.
ACK.
Nicolas