Am 2004-08-11 21:45:39, schrieb Thomas Roessler:
> On 2004-08-11 21:42:03 +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
>
> > Please don't change this. I really want to keep a local copy, so
> > if writing the copy fails, mutt should not send the message. And
> > I think of problems like disc full, power outage,... which can't
> > be detected before writing the message.
>
> Agreed.
I do not agree, because if my MTA fails to deliver and I must try it
several times I must delete ten or more copies in the SEND boxes...
Already tried to open a mailbox of 10.000 or more messages several
times a day ?
Mutt must detect minimal, that it has already written a Fcc and not
write a second or tenst...
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature