* Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@xxxxxxxxxx> [2004:08:11:22:23:20+0200] scribed: > Am 2004-08-11 21:45:39, schrieb Thomas Roessler: > > On 2004-08-11 21:42:03 +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > > > > Please don't change this. I really want to keep a local copy, so > > > if writing the copy fails, mutt should not send the message. And > > > I think of problems like disc full, power outage,... which can't > > > be detected before writing the message. > > > > Agreed. > > I do not agree, because if my MTA fails to deliver and I must try it > several times I must delete ten or more copies in the SEND boxes... How often does this happen? What is the purpose of FCC? Why should mutt -- by definition an MUA -- be held responsible for your, or somebody else's, MTA? > Already tried to open a mailbox of 10.000 or more messages several > times a day ? What does this have to do with your FCC issue? Is it possible to archive older FCC'd messages? > Mutt must detect minimal, that it has already written a Fcc and not > write a second or tenst... Perhaps, for you. IMHO, I want my Sent folder to be a complete history of every message I sent -- and tried to send. Then, each month, I archive older historical messages to archive directories. But, that's just me ;> -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature