Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver
* Michelle Konzack [Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:13:46 +0200]:
> But for every try to send a message which failed I get a
> Fcc to the defined Mailbox (I gave mor then one SEND-Box)
> This Bug is reported today in the Debian GNU/Linux
> Bug-Tracking-System.
Bug#264973, just for the record. Thanks Michelle for bringing this to
mutt-user where more feedback has been received that in mutt-dev.
* Michael D Schleif [Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:50:01 -0500]:
> * Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@xxxxxxxxxx> [2004:08:11:22:23:20+0200]
> scribed:
> > I do not agree, because if my MTA fails to deliver and I must try it
> > several times I must delete ten or more copies in the SEND boxes...
> How often does this happen? What is the purpose of FCC? Why should
> mutt -- by definition an MUA -- be held responsible for your, or
> somebody else's, MTA?
I basicaly agree with this...
* Nicolas Rachinsky [Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:55:57 +0200]:
> > I do not agree, because if my MTA fails to deliver and I must try it
> > several times I must delete ten or more copies in the SEND boxes...
> I think you should use a better MTA. One which does queuing, for
> example.
> If my MTA fails to take the mail from mutt, it's (almost) always a
> permanent error.
... and with this.
And of course with the "Thomas has spoken" bit. ;-)
thanks all,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
There may be no I in TEAM, but a M and an E.