Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver

To: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:36:24 +0200
Cc: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040811202320.GI594@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@xxxxxxxxxx>, mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
References: <20040811191346.GC594@xxxxxxxxxx> <20040811194203.GB41578@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040811194539.GB2183@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040811202320.GI594@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On 2004-08-11 22:23:20 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:

> I do not agree, because if my MTA fails to deliver and I must try
> it several times I must delete ten or more copies in the SEND
> boxes...

As others pointed out already, you should probably fix your MTA
setup.  And no, installing a queuing MTA is *not* overkill when your
net connection is unreliable.

> Already tried to open a mailbox of 10.000 or more messages several 
> times a day ? 

I'm doing that regularly.

-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.

Attachment: pgpEtTEjw9sCl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver
  - From: Michelle Konzack
- Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver
  - From: Nicolas Rachinsky
- Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver
  - From: Michelle Konzack

Prev by Date: Re: Terminal for mutt with clickable links.
Next by Date: mails from hotmail
Previous by thread: Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver
Next by thread: Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread