Michelle, et al -- Please excuse me for comign in late. I have one question which may clarify matters... ...and then Michelle Konzack said... % % Am 2004-08-11 21:45:39, schrieb Thomas Roessler: % > On 2004-08-11 21:42:03 +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: % > % > > Please don't change this. I really want to keep a local copy, so % > > if writing the copy fails, mutt should not send the message. And % > > I think of problems like disc full, power outage,... which can't % > > be detected before writing the message. % > % > Agreed. % % I do not agree, because if my MTA fails to deliver and I must try it % several times I must delete ten or more copies in the SEND boxes... When you resend a message, how do you do it? Is it a simple bounce or a true new mailing? If it is a new mailing, with a new envelope and a fresh Message-ID:, then it makes sense for mutt to write a fresh copy, whereas if it's just a bounce to reinject then mutt already doesn't write another copy. OK, a second question (giving me a bit of leeway counting the first two questions as really part of the same one), then. If you send a fresh copy instead of bouncing to reinject, why not switch to reinjecting? HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G davidtg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
Attachment:
pgp4apUB0vfF1.pgp
Description: PGP signature