Hi, all -- ...and then Nicolas Rachinsky said... % % * Nicolas Rachinsky <list@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-08-10 19:13 +0200]: % > * David T-G <davidtg-muttusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-08-10 12:09 -0400]: % > > I just lost some mail by specifying a non-existent directory in my % > > folder-hook for that address. Darn! % > > % > > I personally would rather see mail that can't be properly fcc:ed dropped % > > into my $spoolfile, but it should (IMHO) be put *somewhere*. Is this % > > problem fixed in 1.5.x or should I send in a bug/feature post? % > % > It isn't with 1.5.6. But I think mutt shouldn't put it somewhere, it % > should complain and refuse to send the message. That also sounds good to me. % % % * Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-08-10 19:54 +0200]: ... % > > /path/to/shit: No such file or directory (errno = 2) ... % > did I misunderstood something. The code in the functions in in for ages % > (most of them over 6 years?!) % % Obviously my test was broken. It just created my test file. With % /path/to/shit or just /p mutt complains and refuses to send the % message. Well, perhaps then *I* have misunderstood something. The email messages definitely were sent, but no copy was made because the directory did not exist at all. I will have to try some more debugging on this. Well, no; first I'll get around to upgrading; let's introduce as few variables as possible :-) [The good news is that I just landed a contract and so I should have a *normally* busy life now, which will leave me time to bring my cocktail up to date and get to know 1.5.6 better :-] % % Sorry, % Nicolas Thanks & HAND :-D -- David T-G davidtg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
Attachment:
pgp6Zl2hq7qNm.pgp
Description: PGP signature