Re: lost mail when folder-hook was wrong
* Nicolas Rachinsky <list@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-08-10 19:13 +0200]:
> * David T-G <davidtg-muttusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-08-10 12:09 -0400]:
> > I just lost some mail by specifying a non-existent directory in my
> > folder-hook for that address. Darn!
> >
> > I personally would rather see mail that can't be properly fcc:ed dropped
> > into my $spoolfile, but it should (IMHO) be put *somewhere*. Is this
> > problem fixed in 1.5.x or should I send in a bug/feature post?
>
> It isn't with 1.5.6. But I think mutt shouldn't put it somewhere, it
> should complain and refuse to send the message.
* Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-08-10 19:54 +0200]:
> * Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [040810 19:42]:
> > I think it's fixed. When I send a eMail with FCC to /path/to/shit, I get
> > the following mutt_error when pressing 'send' and no eMail is sent:
>
> > /path/to/shit: No such file or directory (errno = 2)
>
> > The corresponding code looks very sane, too. :-)
>
> did I misunderstood something. The code in the functions in in for ages
> (most of them over 6 years?!)
Obviously my test was broken. It just created my test file. With
/path/to/shit or just /p mutt complains and refuses to send the
message.
Sorry,
Nicolas