On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:53:04AM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:29:35AM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > I haven't used a > Slackware package since the 1.2.something-or-other that came with my > Slackware 7.1 way back when, and I've never touched a Mutt DEB. I make it sound like I've been using Mutt forever. In reality, I haven't been using it for that long, but it suited me very well right from the moment I started using it instead of ELM (after I got over my initial "but I'm used to things happening this way" annoyances ... Mutt's so configurable that I essentially recreated my ELM config, and then started changing everything just for fun ... by now, I'd go crazy if I had to use ELM again ... the fact that it totally clobbered my mailbox twice due to a bug that wasn't even scheduled to be fixed doesn't help, of course ... I consider ELM dead. . .). - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpWWXuJyFmsB.pgp
Description: PGP signature