On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:29:35AM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > > In my /etc/Muttrc, I found > > > set pgp_good_sign="^\\[GNUPG:\\] GOODSIG" > > > > Um, whatever ... beats me. . . > > Ask the Debian developpers why they choose this one. ;-) If chatting with Debian packagers gives you a woody, by all means do it. I prefer to just DL the source and build it myself. I haven't used a Slackware package since the 1.2.something-or-other that came with my Slackware 7.1 way back when, and I've never touched a Mutt DEB. > > > I ask myself if I should file a flea? > > > > I don't. Mutt isn't interpreting pgp_good_sign here, AFAICT. I just > > looked at the docs, and I wonder whether pgp_good_sign is consulted > > only if the return value is zero. I'm gonna try tweaking my gpg.mutt > > script to always return true, and I'll followup here in a few minutes. > > I'll sleep later, I guess. . . > > I tried before, changing pgp_good_sign to nonsense: After this, an > uppercase "S" did never occur, with neither of both mails, so it seems > mutt is interpreting pgp_good_sign. Yeah, that'd be a safe assumption, but my gpg.mutt hack proves it once and for all (see my followup, which sure enough came a few minutes later). > So, I'll wait until you have investigated a little bit. I guess I should be expecting to hear from you within a short moment, so. . . > Ah, and before I forget it: Good night. ;-) ...I'm not gonna go to sleep quite yet ;-) - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpqsTyp1xYry.pgp
Description: PGP signature