Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)
Hi, Tamotsu-san.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:36:09PM +0900,
TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:
> * Tue Feb 27 2007 TAKIZAWA Takashi <taki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Perhaps the difference is:
> > - a bugfix concerning memory allocation
> > - "+tamo" part, which is result thing of discussion by Tamotsu and Alain
> > - a new patch is safer.
>
> Thanks for your explanation.
>
> I (1) reverted the old patch (rev. 3fa665562a95) and
> (2) applied your patches and
> (3) saved "hg diff" as the attached patch.
>
> Can you try this out?
Yes.
I tried your patch.
It functions without trouble.
But mutt_get_first_charset() included in an old patch is not used any longer
and delete it, please.
> Does it have the bug you mentioned above?
No, it does not.
> If it doesn't, it must be easier for Brendan to apply
> than your three conflicting patches.
Thanks.
Brendan, cannot this patch be committed?
--
TAKIZAWA Takashi
http://www.emaillab.org/