<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)



Hi, Tamotsu-san.

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:36:09PM +0900,
 TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:

> * Tue Feb 27 2007 TAKIZAWA Takashi <taki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Perhaps the difference is:
> >   - a bugfix concerning memory allocation
> >   - "+tamo" part, which is result thing of discussion by Tamotsu and Alain
> >   - a new patch is safer. 
> 
> Thanks for your explanation.
> 
> I (1) reverted the old patch (rev. 3fa665562a95) and
>   (2) applied your patches and
>   (3) saved "hg diff" as the attached patch.
> 
> Can you try this out?

Yes.
I tried your patch.
It functions without trouble.
But mutt_get_first_charset() included in an old patch is not used any longer 
and delete it, please. 

> Does it have the bug you mentioned above?

No, it does not.

> If it doesn't, it must be easier for Brendan to apply
> than your three conflicting patches.

Thanks.
Brendan, cannot this patch be committed?

-- 
TAKIZAWA Takashi
http://www.emaillab.org/