Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)
From: Brendan Cully <brendan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 23:11:49 -0800
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=kublai.com; h=received:received:date:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system:user-agent:from:mail-followup-to:x-delivery-agent; q=dns; s=dk; bh=JsmU0AqyAoY1ahGY6JFQ4be+FkY=; b=QTg4oxFa4VjgfnhnjM77o0kPN71a4fqleOzZLRTLk9DctWrQkCFk6THFaEvfP/d2Ja/HTU5BytdWko+Vkg86OrN2L29G2sOOBn8hvaLsZ6dJQAVeF5ZGhEmGQCqieSeXgrMw/WM+wh8S5V6+TMShKrak8mo3wKNzuy7GfF9TCcQ=
In-reply-to: <20070222230443.GD2978@xxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20070222173033.GD2755@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070222180913.GH27139@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070222230443.GD2978@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2007-02-12)

On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 00:04, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > >assumed-charset might be a good idea too.
> 
> http://svn.df7cb.de/debian/mutt/trunk/debian/patches/features/assumed-charset

I've applied this one.

Attachment: pgpM5J5ujrnKs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)
  - From: TAKIZAWA Takashi

References:
- What's needed for mutt 1.6?
  - From: Brendan Cully
- Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6?
  - From: Kyle Wheeler
- Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)
  - From: Christoph Berg

Prev by Date: Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)
Next by Date: Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6?
Previous by thread: Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (xterm title)
Next by thread: Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread