Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)
Hi TAKIZAWA-san,
Could you explain the difference between
1.5.6-assumed.1 (Christoph's one) and 1.5.14-assumed.1?
I have a poor memory.
* Mon Feb 26 2007 TAKIZAWA Takashi <taki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:11:49PM -0800,
> Brendan Cully wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 00:04, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > > >assumed-charset might be a good idea too.
> > >
> > > http://svn.df7cb.de/debian/mutt/trunk/debian/patches/features/assumed-charset
> >
> > I've applied this one.
>
> The above-mentioned patch is very old.
> New patches are the following three.
> http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt+tamo.assumed_charset.1
> http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt.attach_charset.1
> http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt.linear_white_space.1
Maybe it is not enough to say "it's very old."
Why should Brendan apply the new ones?
Concerning "+tamo" part, I've forgotten most of what I did.
But here are some:
http://bugs.mutt.org/2218
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=110717251200761&w=2
These are, for some users (like Alain), quite serious changes.
--
tamo