Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)
Hi, Tamotsu-san.
Perhaps the difference is:
- a bugfix concerning memory allocation
- "+tamo" part, which is result thing of discussion by Tamotsu and Alain
- a new patch is safer.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:01:21PM +0900,
TAKAHASHI Tamotsu wrote:
> Could you explain the difference between
> 1.5.6-assumed.1 (Christoph's one) and 1.5.14-assumed.1?
> I have a poor memory.
>
>
> * Mon Feb 26 2007 TAKIZAWA Takashi <taki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 11:11:49PM -0800,
> > Brendan Cully wrote:
> >
> > > On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 00:04, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > > > >assumed-charset might be a good idea too.
> > > >
> > > > http://svn.df7cb.de/debian/mutt/trunk/debian/patches/features/assumed-charset
> > >
> > > I've applied this one.
> >
> > The above-mentioned patch is very old.
> > New patches are the following three.
> > http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt+tamo.assumed_charset.1
> > http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt.attach_charset.1
> > http://www.emaillab.org/mutt/1.5.14/patch-1.5.14.tt.linear_white_space.1
>
> Maybe it is not enough to say "it's very old."
> Why should Brendan apply the new ones?
>
> Concerning "+tamo" part, I've forgotten most of what I did.
> But here are some:
> http://bugs.mutt.org/2218
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=110717251200761&w=2
> These are, for some users (like Alain), quite serious changes.
--
TAKIZAWA Takashi
http://www.emaillab.org/