Re: Pattern ~X no longer works?
On 2007-02-27 15:53:14 +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 Vincent Lefevre (vincent@xxxxxxxxxx) muttered:
> > The pattern ~X (e.g. ~X1-9) doesn't seem to work any longer, or said
> > otherwise, all the messages are considered as having no attachments
> > (~X0 selects all the messages).
>
> Works, here. Did you add the necessary config, i.e. attachments
> statements?
Hmm... No. This should probably said in the manual under the Patterns
section.
Now I wonder why Mutt doesn't have some (useful) defaults, that would
be applied when no attachments statements have been given.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)