Re: [issue] mailbox is not saved upon signal recv (esp. SIGHUP)
On 2005-01-27, Dickon Hood <dickon-ml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 14:38:58 -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> : On 2005-01-27, Dickon Hood <dickon-ml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> : > That makes screen(1) difficult, when it's expecting an 80x48 terminal.
>
> : That's odd. I have no problem resizing screen or mutt in
> : different-sized terminals. I just tried some experiments
> : reattaching to a screen session from different-sized xterms and
> : resizing them as well. No problem. I'm using
>
> : Screen version 3.09.11 (FAU) 14-Feb-02
> : Mutt 1.5.5.1i (2003-11-05)
> : xterm: XFree86 4.1.0(165)
> : OS: HP-UX 10.20
>
> Try this: run a new screen session in an 80x48 xterm, and start mutt in
> it. Start an 80x24 xterm, and screen -x that new screen. Now try using
> the mutt you've just started, with both screen sessions displaying the one
> mutt. If the screen session is attached and displaying in a terminal
> somewhere, resizing windows doesn't work quite as you'd expect IME.
Ah, I see. That is a different problem. I was only trying 'screen
-d -r' in the new xterm. Thanks for clarifying that.
I had never tried 'screen -x' before. That is really cool! As long
as all terminal windows share a common size, that is.
> : I've also resized my screen sessions while running PuTTY from home
> : without any apparent problems.
>
> Different problem. Resizing terminals running screen works fine, and
> making them bigger works very well indeed. Making them smaller, OTOH, has
> some interesting problems.
The only problem I have seen when making them smaller is that lines
are folded oddly until I type Ctrl-L. Are you seeing other
problems?
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
garyjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Wireless Division
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ | Spokane, Washington, USA