Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver
On 2004-08-13 12:40:02 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2004-08-13 00:57:24, schrieb David T-G:
> > OK, a second question (giving me a bit of leeway counting the first two
> > questions as really part of the same one), then. If you send a fresh
> > copy instead of bouncing to reinject, why not switch to reinjecting?
>
> Because if I leave the Error Message i can not bounce because I am back
> in the Send-Menu.
>
> And second I can't cancel the messages because it is already saved and
> goes into the postpone folder and each time I write a new message, it
> ask me whether I like to sand a postponed message or not (I need this
> feature).
If I've understood correctly, when you get the error, you postpone
the message to send it later. Now, before postponing the message,
couldn't you clear the Fcc line (this could be done with a macro),
so that the next time you try to send the message, it will not be
written to the Fcc folder?
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn / RISC OS / ARM, free software, YP17,
Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, etc.
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA