On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:29:28PM EDT, Ronald J Kimball wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:20:04PM -0400, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > Regardless, the fact that two people can confirm that partial line > > coloring works fine in modern Mutts is enough. I'm gonna have to change > > my WHY_USE [1] to toss that comment. > > I'm actually using Mutt 1.4.2.1i. Should have mentioned that, sorry. I should have noticed that ... stupid me ;-) (Notice that User-Agent is one of the few headers I don't ignore. Being able to tell at a glance which versions exhibit a particular behavior is the primary reason. You'd think I might actually pay attention when it counts. . .) Regardless, if Nicolas says it works, it almost definitely works. (I'd try it out myself, but my config is sadly not so easy to "disable" temporarily. Maybe I should start a WHY_NOT_USE [1] file?) - Dave [1] proposed URL: http://www.bigfatdave.com/dave/mutt/muttdir/WHY_NOT_USE -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpiauLJAC1nF.pgp
Description: PGP signature