On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:03:06PM EDT, Ronald J Kimball wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 09:04:00PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > * David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-05-28 14:29 > > -0400]: > Here's a mutt-friendly regex, based on David's Perl regex, that seems to do > well: > > color body brightblue default \ > '(https?|ftp|gopher|finger):\/\/([^"'"'"' \t\n)>.,!?&]|[.,!?][^"'"'"' > \t\n)>.,!?&]|&([^g]|$)|&g([^t]|$)|>([^;]|$))+' > > (Watch out for line-wrapping. There's a space character before each \t.) > > The URL can't contain ["' \t\n)>]. > The URL can contain [.,!?], but only when not followed by ["' \t\n)>.,!?&]. > The URL can contain &, but only when not followed by gt;. Wow! > P.S. Here are some examples that the regex colors properly. > > http://www.example.com > <http://www.example.com> > "http://www.example.com"; > 'http://www.example.com' > http://www.example.com/?f=1&g=2 > http://www.example.com/?foo&; > http://www.example.com/?f&g > <http://www.example.com/?foo&bar> > Have you seen http://www.example.com? It's great! > Go to http://www.example.com... > Try http://www.example.com, I think you'll like it. > He said, "Check out http://www.example.com."; A few of these don't work properly with my regex ... no fun ... I guess I need to go back and Perl up some more fun stuff ;-) (Hey, you've gotta admit my regex is _far_ simpler than THAT ugly thing, even if it does a bit less.) Regardless, the fact that two people can confirm that partial line coloring works fine in modern Mutts is enough. I'm gonna have to change my WHY_USE [1] to toss that comment. Thanks a bunch, - Dave [1] http://www.bigfatdave.com/dave/mutt/muttdir/WHY_USE -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpjqbJI4FM3y.pgp
Description: PGP signature