On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:30:47PM +0100, T. Ribbrock wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 07:09:39AM -0600, Eugene Lee wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 06:59:04AM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > : On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 06:17:24AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > : > To: David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > : > > : BTW - There's no need to CC me separately, as I'm subscribed to the list. > > > > I've seen this behavior with other people using some GUI mail client > > where they click on some "Reply" button and it replies to all recipients > > listed in To, Cc, From, etc. However, seeing this same behavior from a > > Mutt user... I am perplexed... > > I remember some discussion on another list about just this behaviour - > I've seen cases, where mutt would do a list reply + Cc when hitting > 'L'. I'd have to search for it, though. :-/ The only thing I remember > is that it happened to me before when I was certain I hit list reply. Hmm ... that's a tad annoying ... I mean, I don't mind much receiving an extra copy (Mutt deals nicely with copies), but looking through the headers of that message, I'm betting he probably hit group-reply instead. (It didn't CC me; it CCed the list. That's typical behavior in group-reply, since it TOs the sender and CCs everybody else - or TOs them after the sender, I forget. Either way, the list won't come before the sender in a group-reply, which matches the facts on the field. In list-reply, the list must at least be TOed, and should probably come before anybody else in the TO, at that ... facts on the ground match neither.) - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpCYYPPc8dF5.pgp
Description: PGP signature