On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 04:42:56PM -0600, David Champion wrote: > * On 2003.12.10, in <20031210220648.GG14359@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > * "Todd" <Freedom_Lover@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sascha Andres wrote: > I use genuine vi, rather than vim. Really? You use AT&T VI? I never even knew the thing compiled on any modern UNIX. . . > > (And then the next week and a half will be spent on off topic > > discussions about whose editor can jump taller buildings in fewer > > bounds... :) > > Indeed -- or worse. I predict worse. /me ducks, gun in hand, waiting for the right moment to start blabbering away at all the kitchen sinkers who think it's a mark of valor for your editor to consume more core than the rest of your system combined. . . - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgppqEcqGihqV.pgp
Description: PGP signature