Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
From: Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:07:13 +0200
Cc: Haakon Riiser <haakon.riiser@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050828120355.GE4414@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx, Haakon Riiser <haakon.riiser@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050521201409.GA3031@fox> <20050521202350.GL26894@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050522084222.GA529@fox> <20050522092658.GA10319@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050522101330.GA1922@fox> <20050522102110.GA15178@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050826191946.GA26681@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050828120355.GE4414@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

Hello,

> Bad idea -- not because it's bad functionality, but simply because
> it will surprise users with existing installations.

this should be easy to fix.

        Thomas

References:
- mbox-hook: broken or useless?
  - From: Haakon Riiser
- Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann
- Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
  - From: Haakon Riiser
- Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
  - From: Nicolas Rachinsky
- Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
  - From: Haakon Riiser
- Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann
- Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
  - From: Haakon Riiser
- Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
  - From: Thomas Roessler

Prev by Date: Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
Next by Date: Re: hierarchical folder in mutt?
Previous by thread: Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
Next by thread: Re: mbox-hook: broken or useless?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread