Re: [RFC] header caching for MH (was: [RFC] header+body caching for POP)

[Rocco Rutte <pdmef@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

* Thomas Roessler [06-05-06 09:48:16 +0200] wrote:

> Incidentally, is there any particular reason why the hcache
> code uses (void *) all over the place as opposed to, e.g.,
> (struct hcache *)?

You might want to have a look at the caching patch I asked people to 
test out. It contains a change to hcache.[ch] that does:

  struct header_cache;
  typedef struct header_cache header_cache_t;

in hcache.h and updates the others to use it instead of void* for the 
main hcache handle. The fetch result still remains as 'void*'.

Now I don't know what to do. I just wanted to actually back this change 
out and leave hcache.[ch] as is. Since I would like to see the header 
and body caching for POP go in, should I leave it as is or make a 
separate patch that updates also the header caching for MH?

  bye, Rocco
--
:wq!