<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [RFC] header caching for MH (was: [RFC] header+body caching for POP)



Hello Thomas,

> Incidentally, is there any particular reason why the hcache
> code uses (void *) all over the place as opposed to, e.g.,
> (struct hcache *)?

yes it is. Because depending on the database backend you use with mutt
for hcache there is another type used. That is the idea behind this,
IIRC.

Thanks for commiting,
                Thomas