<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [RFC] header caching for MH (was: [RFC] header+body caching for POP)



On 2006-05-06 09:09:33 +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:

> I didn't compile it, I didn't try it, but this patch is
> trivial as I stated before and looks very good. I would like
> TLR or Brendan to commit it.

Done.

Incidentally, is there any particular reason why the hcache
code uses (void *) all over the place as opposed to, e.g.,
(struct hcache *)?

-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.