<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: group-reply - bug or feature?



Thomas, any chance of this going in?

* Mads Martin Joergensen <mmj@xxxxxxx> [Jun 23. 2005 20:04]:
> * Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Jun 23. 2005 19:34]:
> > >     More precisely the feature had a full consensus: Everybody agreed.
> > > But it wasn't included, for no known reason. The *option* is bloat of
> > > course.
> > 
> > Great... So, Mads, perhaps if you resubmit it without the stuff for
> > the option (i.e. just make it the default behavior, no config
> > variable), it would be accepted.  If I have time this weekend, and you
> > haven't already done it, maybe I will.  Maybe.  ;-)
> 
> Index: send.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/roessler/cvs/mutt/send.c,v
> retrieving revision 3.37
> diff -u -p -r3.37 send.c
> --- send.c      3 Feb 2005 17:01:44 -0000       3.37
> +++ send.c      23 Jun 2005 17:57:47 -0000
> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ int mutt_fetch_recips (ENVELOPE *out, EN
>      if ((flags & SENDGROUPREPLY) && (!in->mail_followup_to || hmfupto != 
> M_YES))
>      {
>        /* if(!mutt_addr_is_user(in->to)) */
> -      rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->to);
> +      rfc822_append (&out->to, in->to);
>        rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->cc);
>      }
>    }
> 
> It's a pretty simple one without the config option :-)
> 
> Any update on the 1.5.10 plans?
> 
> -- 
> Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
> "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
>  and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
>                                 -- A. P. J.
-- 
Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
 and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
                                -- A. P. J.