Re: group-reply - bug or feature?
Thomas, any chance of this going in?
* Mads Martin Joergensen <mmj@xxxxxxx> [Jun 23. 2005 20:04]:
> * Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Jun 23. 2005 19:34]:
> > > More precisely the feature had a full consensus: Everybody agreed.
> > > But it wasn't included, for no known reason. The *option* is bloat of
> > > course.
> >
> > Great... So, Mads, perhaps if you resubmit it without the stuff for
> > the option (i.e. just make it the default behavior, no config
> > variable), it would be accepted. If I have time this weekend, and you
> > haven't already done it, maybe I will. Maybe. ;-)
>
> Index: send.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/roessler/cvs/mutt/send.c,v
> retrieving revision 3.37
> diff -u -p -r3.37 send.c
> --- send.c 3 Feb 2005 17:01:44 -0000 3.37
> +++ send.c 23 Jun 2005 17:57:47 -0000
> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ int mutt_fetch_recips (ENVELOPE *out, EN
> if ((flags & SENDGROUPREPLY) && (!in->mail_followup_to || hmfupto !=
> M_YES))
> {
> /* if(!mutt_addr_is_user(in->to)) */
> - rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->to);
> + rfc822_append (&out->to, in->to);
> rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->cc);
> }
> }
>
> It's a pretty simple one without the config option :-)
>
> Any update on the 1.5.10 plans?
>
> --
> Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
> "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
> and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
> -- A. P. J.
--
Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
-- A. P. J.