Did the following go into 1.5.10 or later? On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:04:07PM +0200, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote: > * Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Jun 23. 2005 19:34]: > > > More precisely the feature had a full consensus: Everybody agreed. > > > But it wasn't included, for no known reason. The *option* is bloat of > > > course. > > Index: send.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/roessler/cvs/mutt/send.c,v > retrieving revision 3.37 > diff -u -p -r3.37 send.c > --- send.c 3 Feb 2005 17:01:44 -0000 3.37 > +++ send.c 23 Jun 2005 17:57:47 -0000 > @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ int mutt_fetch_recips (ENVELOPE *out, EN > if ((flags & SENDGROUPREPLY) && (!in->mail_followup_to || hmfupto != > M_YES)) > { > /* if(!mutt_addr_is_user(in->to)) */ > - rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->to); > + rfc822_append (&out->to, in->to); > rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->cc); > } > } > > It's a pretty simple one without the config option :-) -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
Attachment:
pgpfibqzZO8HN.pgp
Description: PGP signature