Did the following go into 1.5.10 or later?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:04:07PM +0200, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote:
> * Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Jun 23. 2005 19:34]:
> > > More precisely the feature had a full consensus: Everybody agreed.
> > > But it wasn't included, for no known reason. The *option* is bloat of
> > > course.
>
> Index: send.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/roessler/cvs/mutt/send.c,v
> retrieving revision 3.37
> diff -u -p -r3.37 send.c
> --- send.c 3 Feb 2005 17:01:44 -0000 3.37
> +++ send.c 23 Jun 2005 17:57:47 -0000
> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ int mutt_fetch_recips (ENVELOPE *out, EN
> if ((flags & SENDGROUPREPLY) && (!in->mail_followup_to || hmfupto !=
> M_YES))
> {
> /* if(!mutt_addr_is_user(in->to)) */
> - rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->to);
> + rfc822_append (&out->to, in->to);
> rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->cc);
> }
> }
>
> It's a pretty simple one without the config option :-)
--
Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
Attachment:
pgpfibqzZO8HN.pgp
Description: PGP signature