Re: group-reply - bug or feature?
On Monday, June 20, 2005 at 11:47:06 PM +0200, Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
> * Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Jun 20. 2005 23:28]:
>> it should place the address(es) from the To: field of the original
>> e-mail, and copy the CC: as is.
> This have been rejected in the past, with the reason not to bloat mutt
> with another config option.
More precisely the feature had a full consensus: Everybody agreed.
But it wasn't included, for no known reason. The *option* is bloat of
course.
Bye! Alain.
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?