On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:47:06PM +0200, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote: > > On a related note, IIRC, mutt used to reply intelligently (circa mutt > > 1.4) if you executed group-reply on a message that you sent yourself. > > Now, it seems if you do this, it prompts you with a blank To: field. > > This isn't really all that useful... > > > > I think ideally, it should place the address(es) from the To: field of > > the original e-mail, and copy the CC: as is. If I'm not making myself > > understood, please feel free to ask for clarification. > > This have been rejected in the past, with the reason not to bloat mutt > with another config option. Thanks for the patch! I would hardly call a few lines of code bloat, but FWIW I wasn't really suggesting a config option... I could swear mutt already behaved that way in the past, and I can't see how any other behavior makes any sense (given all the other behaviors associated with mutt recognizing one's own e-mail address). That is, I think it makes sense that the behavior I described should be the default and only behavior. I'm curious if anyone finds the current behavior useful (and if so, why). -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
Attachment:
pgpcpHQ6MUVWI.pgp
Description: PGP signature