On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:06:12AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > If there are multiple addresses in the "To: " field, group-reply doesn't > seem to reply to those addresses, even if they're not in $alternates. > Tested with mutt1.5.9, and tried with "-F/dev/null". On a related note, IIRC, mutt used to reply intelligently (circa mutt 1.4) if you executed group-reply on a message that you sent yourself. Now, it seems if you do this, it prompts you with a blank To: field. This isn't really all that useful... I think ideally, it should place the address(es) from the To: field of the original e-mail, and copy the CC: as is. If I'm not making myself understood, please feel free to ask for clarification. Thanks! -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
Attachment:
pgpsF5HCxCN2v.pgp
Description: PGP signature