<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: group-reply - bug or feature?



On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 09:00:34AM +0200, Alain Bench wrote:
>  On Monday, June 20, 2005 at 11:47:06 PM +0200, Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote:
> 
> > * Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Jun 20. 2005 23:28]:
> > > it should place the address(es) from the To: field of the original
> > > e-mail, and copy the CC: as is.
> > This have been rejected in the past, with the reason not to bloat mutt
> > with another config option.
> 
>     More precisely the feature had a full consensus: Everybody agreed.
> But it wasn't included, for no known reason. The *option* is bloat of
> course.

Great... So, Mads, perhaps if you resubmit it without the stuff for
the option (i.e. just make it the default behavior, no config
variable), it would be accepted.  If I have time this weekend, and you
haven't already done it, maybe I will.  Maybe.  ;-)

-- 
Derek D. Martin    http://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail.  Sorry for the inconvenience.  Thank the spammers.

Attachment: pgpz2XFYssr4Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature