Re: ;<Esc>t : mark full threads with tagged messages
* Martin Trautmann <traut@xxxxxx> [2005-06-23 14:31 +0200]:
> The mutt thread patch did not do what I actually expected: extending the
> common ; prefix to the common <Esc>t behavior.
>
> >From http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.html I read that you have a new
> pattern ~a for this purpose. Might I suggest a patch that seems (to me)
> like the most obvious behavior" ;-)
I'm not sure if I understand you expected. What should ; do? Should it
execute an implicit T~(~T)\n?
Nicolas