<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: group-reply - bug or feature?



* Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Jun 23. 2005 19:34]:
> >     More precisely the feature had a full consensus: Everybody agreed.
> > But it wasn't included, for no known reason. The *option* is bloat of
> > course.
> 
> Great... So, Mads, perhaps if you resubmit it without the stuff for
> the option (i.e. just make it the default behavior, no config
> variable), it would be accepted.  If I have time this weekend, and you
> haven't already done it, maybe I will.  Maybe.  ;-)

Index: send.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/roessler/cvs/mutt/send.c,v
retrieving revision 3.37
diff -u -p -r3.37 send.c
--- send.c      3 Feb 2005 17:01:44 -0000       3.37
+++ send.c      23 Jun 2005 17:57:47 -0000
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ int mutt_fetch_recips (ENVELOPE *out, EN
     if ((flags & SENDGROUPREPLY) && (!in->mail_followup_to || hmfupto != 
M_YES))
     {
       /* if(!mutt_addr_is_user(in->to)) */
-      rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->to);
+      rfc822_append (&out->to, in->to);
       rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->cc);
     }
   }

It's a pretty simple one without the config option :-)

Any update on the 1.5.10 plans?

-- 
Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
 and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
                                -- A. P. J.