<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: group-reply - bug or feature?



On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:04:07PM +0200, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote:
> Index: send.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/roessler/cvs/mutt/send.c,v
> retrieving revision 3.37
> diff -u -p -r3.37 send.c
> --- send.c      3 Feb 2005 17:01:44 -0000       3.37
> +++ send.c      23 Jun 2005 17:57:47 -0000
> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ int mutt_fetch_recips (ENVELOPE *out, EN
>      if ((flags & SENDGROUPREPLY) && (!in->mail_followup_to || hmfupto != 
> M_YES))
>      {
>        /* if(!mutt_addr_is_user(in->to)) */
> -      rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->to);
> +      rfc822_append (&out->to, in->to);
>        rfc822_append (&out->cc, in->cc);
>      }
>    }
> 
> It's a pretty simple one without the config option :-)

Excellent.  So Thomas et. al., can this go in?  Anyone object?
Thusfar everyone who's said anything seems to agree this is the Right
Thing...

-- 
Derek D. Martin    http://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail.  Sorry for the inconvenience.  Thank the spammers.

Attachment: pgp1hH0LUH54X.pgp
Description: PGP signature