<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Re: [ga] LatinoamerICANN publica versión en españolde los Estatutos del ICANN



Can we talk about something less inflammatory, like, perhaps, religion
or politics?

I think it's time to move on.

Thanks,


Wednesday, March 10, 2004, 8:15:55 AM, Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
JW> Kim and all former DNSO GA members or other interested stakeholders/users,

JW> Kim Davies wrote:

>> Hi,
>>
>> Jeff Williams wrote:
>> >
>> >   I didn't offer or "Come up" with any "Figure" Kim...
>> >
>> >   However, I did say the Majority of subscribers were english
>> > speakers only due to a survey done some time ago on this
>> > forum...
>>
>> You seem to contradict yourself - you say you have no figure then
>> immediately go on to say the "majority" can only speak English.

JW>   That is not a contridiction of any sort.  It exactly correct as I stated
JW> it.

>> (You
>> said the majority can _only_ speak English before, but maybe you have
>> changed your mind now.)

JW>   Not at all.  I said the Majority of subscribers to this forum are english
JW> speakers only.  That is exactly correct and correct as I stated it.  Hence
JW> it would appear you are confused, and also seemingly attempting to
JW> confuse or state the opposite as though I stated it differently.  Ergo
JW> you are confused in the extreme in this instance..  You have my
JW> empathy.

>>
>>
>> Anyway, regarding your original comment that is "exceedingly rude" not
>> to post in English here:
>>
>> The post in question was in Spanish. It would take 5 seconds to bring up
>> a free online machine translator to convert Spanish into English, and
>> give you a reasonable translation that would allow you to understand
>> what was said.

JW>   I don't need to I read write and speak spanish quite well.  Other fellow
JW> stakeholders/users and this forums subscribers do not, and should not
JW> be subjected to translating via any means what another poster posted.
JW> Hence in part why it is rude to post in any language on this forum unless
JW> that poster provides a english translation which meets the majority of the
JW> subscribers of this forum.  "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" ...

>>
>>
>> This may even give you a small inkling of the frustrations many people
>> have participating in the ICANN process. Many have to translate to and
>> from English, day in day out, when they want to participate in these forums.

JW>  If they are non-English speakers which it the international excepted 
language,
JW> and the forum members are in the majority english speakers only, than yes
JW> those that are non-English speakers must do their own translation.

>>
>>
>> To me, what is exceedingly rude is boldly asserting everyone must speak
>> English.

JW>   I don't insist nor have I ever insisted everyone speak English.  When in
JW> mexico or Spain for instance I speak Spanish only.  That is because the
JW> majority of the people in Mexico and Spain speak spanish only, do not
JW> speak english well, or spanish is their most commonly understood language.

>> I think is an arrogant gesture that belittles the effort
>> involved for non-English speakers to participate - because you are
>> inferring that the most important thing is sparing you the mininal
>> effort it would take you translate the very occasional non-English post.

JW>   I should not have to to make a special effort for a special case if
JW> the majority of the subscribers of a Email forum are english speakers
JW> only.  It is rude in the extreme to knowingly post to a forum where it
JW> is well known by the poster whom posts in other than english to post
JW> in his or her native language without providing a English translation for
JW> the majority of the subscribers of that forum.  This is exactly what
JW> Erick did.  Ergo, he was being rude for some reason that is inconsistent
JW> with good manners and common courtesy to his fellow subscribers.

>>
>>
>> ICANN is a global forum, and a great many people interested in ICANN do
>> not have English as their first language. You might assume that the
>> majority of people interested in the DNS are American, but I would disagree.

JW>   I make no assumption as to whether the majority of those interested in
JW> DNS issues or ICANN as a whole [ Hole? ] are american or any other
JW> nationality.  Nothing in my previous comments or remarks would rationally
JW> indicate such.  Hence I can only surmise you are arguing for the sake of
JW> doing so.  That too is also rude in the extreme...

>>
>>
>> With such a minute fraction of posts here in languages other than
>> English, I don't see what the problem is when such posts can be easily
>> translated or ignored.

JW>   I suppose ignorance is bliss.  However intentional ignorance or ignorance
JW> for a reason of not being multilingual is foolish.  Hence again why Ericks
JW> failure to provide a translation to english for the majority of subscribers
JW> of this forum is even more inconsiderate than usual or expectable.

>>
>>
>> kim

JW> Regretful regards,
JW> --
JW> Jeffrey A. Williams
JW> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
JW> "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
JW>     Pierre Abelard

JW> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
JW> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
JW> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
JW> United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
JW> ===============================================================
JW> Updated 1/26/04
JW> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
JW> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
JW> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
JW>  Registered Email addr with the USPS
JW> Contact Number: 214-244-4827





----
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA     Internet Concepts, Inc.
donbrown_l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx         http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55              (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
----