Hi, * markus reichelt wrote (2004-10-28 22:25): >Thorsten Haude <mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> muttered: >> >The reason I can recommend procmail, without any hesitation that it >> >might be too much of a burden for the newb to handle, is that the >> >newbs I knew didn't stay newbs for long and in the long run it just >> >paid off. >> >> And this is where I disagree. For that payoff to work, there must be >> something that Procmail can do that others can't. There isn't. You >> just waste time learning its weird syntax. > >That's pretty confident for a non-procmail user to say I used it for one or two years, exactly because it's recommended by most people. (Misery loves company or something.) >You have good if not best experiences with maildrop and you recommend >it, that's fine with me and I expect it from you. But I have to >disagree with your reasoning: Lets the newb decide what he likes and >works best with, just point out the tools available to him. Please do. Alas, all I ever see is talk about Procmail. Thorsten -- There is no drug known to man which becomes safer when its production and distribution are handed over to criminals.
Attachment:
pgpcpls7EErEZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature