Re: bad PGP sig (was: When is a sig not a sig?)

To: Mutt users ml <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: bad PGP sig (was: When is a sig not a sig?)
From: James R Grinter <jrg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:36:01 +0000
In-reply-to: <20040924200634.GA19219@xxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt users ml <mutt-users@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20040924152141.GA840@home> <20040924153806.GE6508@xxxxxxxx> <20040924154711.GG6508@xxxxxxxx> <20040924200634.GA19219@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i

On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 10:06:35PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote:
>     Probably yes, or something around. MTA, MDA, filter, or something,
> on colonelk.gbnet.net. CC to owner?

I don't think it's us here. I can see it in the messages before they've
got anywhere near Majordomo-2 (all they've been through is qmail).

What about:
  X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at clerc.nl

James.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bad PGP sig (was: When is a sig not a sig?)
  - From: Alain Bench

References:
- When is a sig not a sig?
  - From: George
- Re: When is a sig not a sig?
  - From: René Clerc
- Re: When is a sig not a sig?
  - From: René Clerc
- bad PGP sig (was: When is a sig not a sig?)
  - From: Alain Bench

Prev by Date: Re: Header-Cache problem with cache size
Next by Date: Re: Problem replying to this list
Previous by thread: bad PGP sig (was: When is a sig not a sig?)
Next by thread: Re: bad PGP sig (was: When is a sig not a sig?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread