On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 01:10:40PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > > mutt-dev/mutt-users appears to be the only one that I reply to which sets > > > up the headers to confuse pine (ymmv). I use pine on one of my ISP's, > > > mutt on another (and mutt on my local boxes). Be patient... > > > > Um, oh, I see ... you use that "barebone" MUA (according to the guys at > > PC Magazine - can't blame me) from www.washington.edu ;-P > > it's an inexpensive setup & works with my network Mutt's also fairly inexpensive, no? > > /me knows very little about xterms ... running a real tty seems to make > > far more sense than firing up X just to get a window emulating a tty. . . > > I haven't used a real tty for 4-5 years. (The various console emulators > are no more real than xterm). The Linux VTs are far more real than an xterm, in the sense that they're not nearly as far removed from the real thing. - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgp5CIOlrK8Dj.pgp
Description: PGP signature