On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:31:21AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > ...and then David Yitzchak Cohen said... > % Is there any reason for not putting the latest version of the Mutt docs > online? > > None at all. In fact, it's already done. The 1.4x docs are right up > there; you pointed to them yourself. The 1.4.x docs aren't the latest version. > Oh, you mean the under-development CVS docs? Yes, smarty pants :-) > I'd say a good reason is > because they're not the latest version of the docs but instead a dev > version. The latest dev version is the latest version. Being labeled "dev" doesn't make it any less of a version. Yes, it's a different type of version, but no, it's still a version, and since it's the latest thing out there and it is a version, it's the latest version by implication. > Get 'em from CVS the same way you did the package. Unfortunately, that doesn't work. CVS contains only source files, no HTML. > Or get it > out of the tarball you downloaded to get this mutt (doc/manual.txt). ...what tarball? > Or > press F1 and see what you have installed with your development version. nothing ;-) - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgp4oTf2BfiIW.pgp
Description: PGP signature