Hello Kyle,
Am 2008-10-08 11:41:39, schrieb Kyle Wheeler:
> <soapbox>
> Mutt is powerful because it is flexible, not because getting it set up
> is as simplistic and direct as possible. The question to ask with mutt
> is "can it be made to do X without digging into the source code",
> whereas other mailers cannot even hope to do X without touching their
> source code to make a special "does X" feature (how many email
> programs allow you to alter the type of pgp signature based on the
> recipients? I haven't found any). Mutt is not a mailer for the faint
> of heart looking for a quick, easy way of reading email. Mutt is a
> mailer for people who are very particular about their email, but who
> are willing to invest a little work to get it just so.
> </soapbox>
This get a FullACK!
Note: Currently I am coding a new Intranet-MUA (GTK+ for X and pixbuf)
entirely written in perl and implementing many mutt functions...
And right, there is not a singel MUA which can reach mutt's
capacities...
I should also note, that my MUA is not intent to handel a bunch
of mailinglists with several 1000 messages per day, since it is
IMAP only and PostgreSQL driven. Oh, also I am using procmail
for this implementation...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
+49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature