On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:10:21AM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:50:41AM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > >I don't know whats those 'many other', but mutt does support nearly all > >common email features I am aware off. It even supports Delivery Status > >Notifications that are (as far as I can see that) less wideley supported > >and therefore even more useless. So i don't *understand* the reasoning > > But DSNs are the way to go. That's only true if the people you communicate want to use them. If the people you want to communicate want to use some other commonly implemented feature, then that's the ONLY way to go. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Attachment:
pgpHSqhs3nWMY.pgp
Description: PGP signature