Re: how about the notion of filters for replying, etc.
=- Sweth Chandramouli wrote on Thu 28.Dec'06 at 20:17:53 -0500 -=
> On Thursday, 28 December 2006 at 17:35:26 EST,
> Kyle Wheeler (<kyle-mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>) wrote:
> > ...? You mean like this:
> >
> > set editor="myfilter.pl | $EDITOR"
>
> Nope. What's passed to $editor is the message that you are
> composing. What the hypothetical $reply_filter would be passed
> would be the message to which you are responding. That way, you
> can access and act on info in the headers of the message being
> replied to that would otherwise never even make it into the temp
> file passed to $editor. (Examples below.)
set header=yes
set edit_headers=yes
set weed=no
<reply>
Then see what happens. Use your filter to parse quoted lines as
you desire to adjust your unquoted stuff. If you don't want to
"see" all headers while typing your msg in your real editor, then
make your filter cut them off before sending to the real editor,
and reattach the necessary stuff before returning to mutt,
potentially dropping unwanted quoted lines which have been only
used to digest the msg.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
Even if it seems insignificant, in fact EVERY effort counts
for a shared task, at least to show your deserving attitude.