Re: Author name rather than list name for subscribed lists
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> Paul Puschmann wrote:
> > Okay, I understand that this list doesn't do the errors other
> > lists do, but I I found no ressource why not having an List-Id is
> > better. (Hoping not to mix something up).
Having a List-Id would be reasonable since if I recall correctly it is
listed in the RFC. But rarely is List-Id actually useful to me since
the contents of it are not standardized and most lists are so very
dissimilar as to be completely useless to me.
> More of the lists I am subscribed use "X-Mailinglist:", and I agree
X-Mailinglist? Or do you mean X-Mailing-List? I usually see the
latter. But it is not required either and Mailman does something
completely different by using X-BeenThere.
Bob