Re: Author name rather than list name for subscribed lists
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 09:48:30PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > Paul Puschmann wrote:
> > > Okay, I understand that this list doesn't do the errors other
> > > lists do, but I I found no ressource why not having an List-Id is
> > > better. (Hoping not to mix something up).
>
> Having a List-Id would be reasonable since if I recall correctly it is
> listed in the RFC. But rarely is List-Id actually useful to me since
> the contents of it are not standardized and most lists are so very
> dissimilar as to be completely useless to me.
>
> > More of the lists I am subscribed use "X-Mailinglist:", and I agree
>
> X-Mailinglist? Or do you mean X-Mailing-List? I usually see the
> latter. But it is not required either and Mailman does something
> completely different by using X-BeenThere.
>
Whatever ;-)
I think it would be nice to have a header where mutt can use the
list-reply. (so I don't have to use subscribe ... im my .muttrc).
Anyway, I a have a customised index now and I am happy with this one.
Kind regards, Paul
--