On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:32:59AM EDT, Mark Frank wrote:
> * On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 10:38:42AM +0200 Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
> > * On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 04:08:07AM -0400 David Yitzchak Cohen wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 03:02:13AM EDT, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
> > This and the "great" history of sendmail vulnerabilities are the reasons
> > why I don't like sendmail.
>
> I hope you don't use OpenSSH either since it has a history of
> vulnerabilities. Yes, I know they've been fixed but so has sendmail's.
Yup, I use OpenSSH too. I just make sure to upgrade as soon as I see
security-related announcements.
> > > If I were going to do that, my approach would probably be to define
> > > two mailers, the smtp mailer, and the relay-to-smarthost mailer. I'd
> > > then tell sendmail to try smtp first for any given message, and
> > > failing that (4xx error code) to fallback to the smarthost relay.
> > > ("Can your exim do THAT?" ... hehe. . .)
>
> While I admire your propensity to complicate matters as much as possible
> David, the original question in this thread was answered quite succinctly
> by Nicolas Rachins. Mailertable is the answer. Actually, a good question
> for the original poster is why not use the non-blacklisted smart host all
> the time?
Oh, so you're trying to bring us back on-topic? How DARE you!?! ;-P
- Dave
--
Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor?
It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right?
Please visit this link:
http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpkjjm0gQdug.pgp
Description: PGP signature