On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 02:02:32PM +0100, Alain Bench wrote: > On Friday, October 31, 2003 at 2:12:05 PM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:59:53AM +0100, Alain Bench wrote: > >> On Thursday, October 30, 2003 at 4:47:41 PM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen > >> wrote: > >>> Cc: =?utf-8?B?U8OpqWJhc3RpZW4=?= [...] > >> that is invalid UTF-8 > > My Mutt configuration is online > > I didn't found anything causing the problem, even simulating being > you with your rc files. BTW also found nothing explaining your not MFT > honoring problem: I (Dave) could reply OK to myself (Alain) on mutt-dev. interesting. . . > > LANG=es > > LC_ALL=es_ES.UTF-8 > > Better use single LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, unsetting LC_ALL: Will give > *exact* same result, but cleaner. Yeah, I probably should do so. I've been too lazy for a while ;-) > In another thread you say you use es_ES.UTF-8 without having it > installed. Bad. Verify doing (case matters): > > | $ locale --all-locales | grep ^es_ES > | es_ES > | es_ES.iso-8859-15 > | es_ES.utf-8 > | es_ES@euro $ locale --all-locales | grep ^es_ES es_ES es_ES@euro es_ES.iso88591 es_ES.iso885915@euro es_ES.utf8 > And in Mutt typing ":reset charset; set ?charset" to see if guessed > default charset matches locale. ...results in: charset="utf-8" > Or typing "locale charmap" at shell. $ locale charmap UTF-8 > In your muttrc you set $locale=es_ES: This uses implicit Latin-1, > incompatible with UTF-8. Bad. The general rule is to use always same or > compatible charsets for every locale category. really? Lemme look at my config. . . Yeah, good point ... done. > > You're not talking about my original reply, are you? > > Yes: Your first in thread, immediate <parent-message> (P) of mine in > a threaded view (well, now 3 levels up). > > > I simply copied/pasted his addy into the CC. > > From pager to askcc prompt, or in editor to Cc: header? probably from pager to askcc prompt ... don't remember that far back ;-) > >| Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:47:41 -0500 > >| Cc: Sé�bastien Hinderer <Sebastien.Hinderer@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > copied/pasted from my sent view > > This time there was valid UTF-8, but a spurious replacement char > U+FFFD inserted between 'é' and 'b'. Was the invalid byte raw in sent > folder, on sent folder display, or the copy/paste generated it? I don't understand :-( > What > copy/paste do you use: Mouse /usr/sbin/gpm, or some function of screen? I know I used screen for that copy/paste, and in general I find myself using screen's copy/paste often even from within VI ... go figure. . . > -- > Mutt muttrc tip to send mails in best adapted first necessary and sufficient > charset (version for Western Latin-1/Latin-9/CP-850/CP-1252 terminal users): > set send_charset="us-ascii:iso-8859-1:iso-8859-15:windows-1252:utf-8" Yeah, I know. I purposely changed it to UTF, in order to encourage its use. Thanks a bunch for going through all that to help me out. It really means a lot to me. - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpmDu4KxlvRs.pgp
Description: PGP signature