<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: about pgp-signed messages



On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 04:56:58PM +0000, Richard Curnow wrote:

> * David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2003-11-05]:
> > I'm behind a firewall and have no problems whatsoever.  The obvious
> > conclusion here is that not all firewalls are created equal, so you'll
> > have to give us some more info.  What exactly does your firewall block,
> > and what does it not block?
> 
> Based on your reply, I concluded the problem was at this end.  I turns
> out that our proxy is set to restrict which port numbers in URLs it will
> connect to (i.e. 80 + a few specific other ones, but certainly not a
> wildcard.) And 11371 was not in the list.  Now it's been added I can use
> 'gpg --recv-keys' happily.

That's interesting corporate policy: "Let's just punch more holes in
our firewall!"

> Thanks for the help.

NP :-)

 - Dave

-- 
Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor?
It's simple, Skyler.  You've seen what food processors do to food, right?

Please visit this link:
http://rotter.net/israel

Attachment: pgpDy1eswRyj7.pgp
Description: PGP signature