On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:43:44PM -0500, Rouben Rostamian wrote: > I have not experimented with pgp-signing mainly because I am not quite > convinced of its value in casual communications, such as messages sent > to this, or any other, mailing list. When some spammer starts sending all sorts of crap to a list you're on claiming to be you, you may rapidly become convinced of its value. > On the other hand, I finds signed messages annoying. I don't have > any of senders' public keys -- this is an international forum, after > all -- so pgp verification always fails. Well, you can set GPG to automatically fetch keys, or you can manually fetch keys you care about (which is what I do, with a handy little script). > purpose. huh? > Is there a way to tell mutt that I don't care to see any of this > pgp-related stuff? RTFMing, one notes in 6.3 (configuration variables): pgp_verify_sig Type: quadoption Default: yes If ``yes'', always attempt to verify PGP/MIME signatures. If ``ask-yes'' or ``ask-no'', ask whether or not to verify the signature. If ``no'', never attempt to verify PGP/MIME signatures. HTH, - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpvkhO9GPMnu.pgp
Description: PGP signature