<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6?



On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:13:53PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:

> We just need to make sure that eg asciidoc does what mutt needs. No
> more than that, I think.

The problem is that what mutt needs will expand over time. Isn't that why
the doc generation was moved to docbook in the first place...?

-- 
Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature