<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6?



On Friday, 02 March 2007 at 14:47, Paul Walker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:13:53PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> 
> > We just need to make sure that eg asciidoc does what mutt needs. No
> > more than that, I think.
> 
> The problem is that what mutt needs will expand over time. Isn't that why
> the doc generation was moved to docbook in the first place...?

Well no, it was really that the old linuxdoc tool chain was
moribund. I had a devil of a time trying to get it to build on OS X,
and I think others were having similar problems in other
environments.

Attachment: pgpwcGidHRhfT.pgp
Description: PGP signature